Emphasizing coordinative ideas

08/08/2020

For world peace, there is a greater need to emphasize coordinative ideas rather than bombs. Today, such weapons exist in the whole world, which can destroy them as soon as the spinach is done. Not only this, but we can also destroy the world hundreds of times. Most of the member countries want to eliminate the weapons of genocide, but this has not been discussed in the disarmament conferences for the last two decades. Due to this, talks are being held on the issues of arms control. Apart from this, new technologies in the field of weapons are increasing these risks in ways that we cannot even imagine.Nuclear weapons have damaged human creation as much as any other. Despite this, destructive weapon has left its shield to strengthen its existence in the world and to maintain its existence. May it is not so that the existence of the world does not make the existence of the world alive. The US detonated two nuclear weapons on 6 and 9 August 1945 at the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Since 1945, the United States, the Soviet Union / Russia, the United Kingdom, France, China, Israel, India, Pakistan, and North Korea have all armed themselves with nuclear weapons, possessing those who destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki in the past Has much more destructive power than.
International platforms for arms control are becoming weaker. Chemical weapons are being used continuously in the world without fear of punishment, due to which their spread is also increasing. Illegal small arms and explosives are being used, due to which thousands of common people are being killed all over the world.
States with nuclear weapons have reacted to this vulnerability, an argument that the use of nuclear weapons is impossible because of detention. Nuclear weapons are so destructive that no country would use them because such use would create a sense of vengeance, and no political leader would be prepared to risk the possible death of millions of its citizens. Nuclear weapons not only protect countries against the use of nuclear weapons by others but also prevent war and promote stability. These claims are not even proof. Nuclear threats have not always created fear and in return, fear has not always taken precautions. Conversely, in some cases, nuclear threats have caused anger, and anger may prompt a rage to escalate, as happened to Fidel Castro during the Cuban missile crisis. The desire to believe in the correct controllability and safety of nuclear weapons instills extreme confidence, which is dangerous. Overconfident, as many scholars studying safety will testify, the possibility of accidents and possibly the use of nuclear weapons. In many historical examples, practices that prevented the use of nuclear weapons were not controlled, but outside institutional control His failures or factors were. The most famous of these cases is the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis. There are many more cases during which the world came close to nuclear war.

Share This Story


Comment On This Story

 

Photo Gallery

  
BSE Sensex
NSE Nifty