Lawyers’ protest demanding reopening of Courts completes days-89


JAMMU, Jan 12: The Agitation of Lawyers practicing in Jammu wing of J&K High Court and the Subordinate Courts completed 89 days today. The Lawyers held DHARNA in the Janipura Courts Complex. The lawyers Action Committee carrying ahead the agitation since 15 October 2020 in protest against continuation of suspension of normal functioning of High Court and Subordinate Courts since March end this year.
Today's protest Dharna started with passing of condolence resolution over the sad demise of young advocate Jyoti Sharma. It was joined by advocates: JA Kazmi (former vice president), KK Pangotra, H.C. Jalmeria (Convener of Action Committee), CS Gupta (Former Secretary Jammu Bar), BR Sharma (Former Vice President Jammu Bar), Vinod Abrol, Vijay Sharma, Rajinder Kumar Chanyal, JP Gandhi, Mohd Usman Salaria (former Vice President Jammu Bar), Sabodh Singh Jamwal, JP Sharma, Manohar Gupta, AS Azad, Warris Gill, BS Charak, Monish Chopra, Parvinder Singh, SC Sharma, Amarjeet Singh, Meharban Singh, Anoop Parihar, YP Koushal, Suneet Jamwal, Rakesh Thakur, Pawan Kumar Kundal, Kunal Chib, Manohar Lal, Amit Gupta, SM Wazahat, Om Parkash Hans, Charanjeet Chargo-tra, Yogeshwar Singh, Susheel Kumar, Varun Singh, Arvind Singh Jalme-ria, Mehrul Puri, Sahil Sharma, Gagandeep Singh Lucky, Ashish, and others.
The lawyers are anguished over repeated extension of restrictions on lawyers and public in High Court and of public in lower courts. It lacks justification now when other fields of human activity including Govt. offices, business, politics and electioneering, marriage gatherings, conducting proceedings of parliament and assemblies, cinema halls, liquor bars, bus and air transport, farmers' protests etc. have become normal since long after lock down. Even some High Courts have started physical hearings. The virtual mode offered is no alternative to physical hearings in courts. Even Supreme Court has given observation of its inaptness. The citizens as well as lawyers are worst affected by the continued suspension of normal functioning of High Court and Subordinate Courts for about 10 months. The Judiciary, the most important institution of democratic India, is the protector of the rights of citizens guaranteed by Constitution and other laws.
The citizens approach the judiciary seeking protection of their constitutional and statutory rights through lawyers who have the status of officers of courts. In the present situation the lawyers are disabled in performance of their professional duties. Effort to negate lawyers' role in dispensation of justice amounts to denial of these rights. It is negation of democracy and constitution and aimed towards dictatorship. The approach to Judiciary should be available to citizens without any hindrance. Shifting of registration work to Revenue from Judicial officers has caused grave harassment to public due to delays and lack of transparency.
The closure of lawyers' facilities including Bar Halls, Library, Canteens etc. in courts is a brazen attack on the lawyers' independent existence and in discharge of their professional duties. The J&K High Court is unreasonably sitting over the holding of elections to J&K State Bar Council despite Supreme Court Directions.
The closure of Consu-mer Courts since Aug 2019 is denial of justice to the consumers in J&K. Remedies under Human Rights Act, RTI Act and Accountability Act are no more available. The contempt proceedings initiated against some young lawyers during previous agitation should not be prolonged in view of the continued restrictions on entry to courts thereafter by official orders. The concerned judicial and executive authorities should resolve the issues.

Share This Story

Comment On This Story


Photo Gallery

BSE Sensex
NSE Nifty