HC rejects interim bail in murder case, says humanitarian grounds cannot outweigh gravity of offence

12/07/2026

JAMMU, Jul 11: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh has refused to grant short-term interim bail to a murder accused, holding that humani-tarian considerations relating to the medical condition of an accused's mother cannot override the gravity of the offence and the larger interest of ensuring a fair and uninfluenced criminal trial.
Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal dismissed the bail application filed by Mohinder Singh, who is lodged in Central Jail, Kot Bhalwal, in connection with FIR No. 57/2024 registered at Police Station R.S. Pura under Sections 302, 341, 147 and 148 of the IPC read with Section 4/25 of the Arms Act.
The petitioner, represented by Advocate Manpreet Singh Saini, sought short-term interim bail on humanitarian grounds, contending that his aged widowed mother was suffering from multiple abdominal stones and required surgery. He pleaded that both he and his younger brother were in judicial custody, leaving no male member in the family to look after their mother or arrange funds for her treatment.
The Union Territory, represented by Deputy Advocate General Pawan Dev Singh, opposed the plea, arguing that the allegations against the accused were extremely grave, material prosecution witnesses were yet to be examined and his release could result in intimidation of witnesses and prejudice to the trial. The prosecution also submitted that the petitioner's mother had other family members to care for her and could undergo treatment in a government hospital free of cost.
The High Court noted that the trial court had earlier rejected the petitioner's request for interim bail after observing that the accusations involved a brutal murder in which the deceased was allegedly attacked with sharp-edged weapons, both his hands were chopped off and eyewitnesses were threatened with similar consequences if they testified against the accused.
Relying on Supreme Court judgments, including State through CBI v. Amarmani Tripathi, Mahipal v. Rajesh Kumar, and Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v. Rajesh Ranjan, Justice Nargal reiterated that while considering bail, courts must examine the existence of a prima facie case, the gravity of the offence, the severity of punishment, the possibility of witness intimidation and the larger interest of justice.
The court observed that the allegations against the petitioner were "of an exceptionally heinous nature" and that the material collected during investigation disclosed a strong prima facie case. It further noted that the trial was still in progress and the apprehension of the prosecution regarding possible intimidation of witnesses could not be dismissed as unfounded.
Rejecting the plea based on the petitioner's mother's medical condition, the court held that the record indicated she was not without family support, as she was being looked after by her daughter-in-law and could also be assisted by her daughter and son-in-law. It also noted that the proposed surgery could be performed in a government hospital without financial burden.
The High Court further observed that the petitioner had earlier sought identical relief before the Principal Sessions Judge, Jammu, which had been rejected, and that no subsequent change in circumstances had been shown to justify a different view.
Holding that the humanitarian ground projected by the petitioner was not exceptional enough to outweigh the seriousness of the accusations and the need to preserve the fairness of the trial, Justice Nargal dismissed the bail application, clarifying that the observations made in the order were confined to the adjudication of the interim bail plea and would not influence the merits of the trial.

Photo Gallery

BSE Sensex

NSE Nifty